Audit your Article 30 RoPA spreadsheet in seconds.
Drop your CSV here
or click to browse your files · CSV only
When to use GDPR Article 30 RoPA Completeness Auditor
Annual RoPA refresh ahead of CNIL, DPC, or CNPD supervisory reviews
Finding undocumented third-country transfers and missing Data Protection Framework references
Ensuring all special category data has an Article 9 legal exception documented
How to export from Excel / Google Sheets RoPA and clean in MiniJudge
Follow these steps to extract your raw spreadsheet and filter it without writing code:
The Danger of “Excel Purgatory” in GDPR Article 30 RoPA Completeness Auditor
The Regulatory Rejection Bottleneck
Whether submitting a 15-table DORA ICT register to the CSSF eDesk portal (Regulation EU 2024/2956) or maintaining an Article 30 RoPA for supervisory review, Excel cannot enforce relational integrity. A single malformed 20-character LEI, blank statutory retention period, or unmapped international transfer causes official package rejection and emergency legal review cycles costing €15,000+ in auditor fees.
The Missing Evidence Ledger
A simple “Yes” in an internal vendor questionnaire is no longer acceptable to auditors. Regulators demand verifiable provenance: Document → Page → Clause → Exact Excerpt → Status. Manual cross-referencing between 30-page PDF contracts and spreadsheets creates fatigue after just 5 documents, leaving critical subprocessor liabilities and AI training licenses undiscovered.
Hard Judge Schema
Deterministic regex checks ISO 17442 LEI syntax, date formats, required Article 30 columns, and cross-table foreign key constraints in microseconds.
Soft Clause Reasoning
Evaluates complex contractual text against GDPR Article 28(3) and EU AI Act obligations: subprocessor notice windows, audit access, and training opt-outs.
Typed Evidence Ledger
Assigns rigid regulatory statuses (VERIFIED, MISSING, CONFLICTING) with citation references.
Air-Gapped Export
Processes data 100% in-memory without persistent database storage, satisfying Luxembourg and Swiss banking confidentiality standards.
What MiniJudge appends to your spreadsheet
| Source / Item | Requirement | Status | Evidence Excerpt | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWS_Cloud_DPA.pdf | Art. 28(3)(h) Audit Access | VERIFIED | “Allows for and contributes to audits...” | None (Compliant) |
| Shadow_Analytics.pdf | ISO 17442 LEI Syntax | MISSING | LEI field blank in contract register | Request vendor LEI before submission |
| FastMailer_DPA.pdf | Art. 28(3)(a) Subprocessors | CONFLICTING | “Vendor may add subprocessors without notice” | Require 30-day prior written notice |
MiniJudge vs. Enterprise GRC vs. Manual Excel
- • 4.5 hours per register audit
- • No relational validation across tables
- • High human fatigue & missed gaps
- • High risk of regulatory rejection
- • 3+ months enterprise procurement
- • Requires abandoning existing spreadsheets
- • Heavy overhead for mid-size teams
- • Expensive per-seat licensing
- • Zero setup: drop your existing CSV/XLSX
- • 12ms deterministic validation
- • Appends verified Evidence Ledgers
- • 100% ephemeral in-browser privacy
Frequently Asked Questions
Does MiniJudge replace a Data Protection Officer (DPO)?
No. MiniJudge acts as an evidence-aware data verification layer that automates the tedious mechanical audit of spreadsheet rows, leaving strategic judgements to your DPO.
